Comments on: Tripowin x HBB Olina Review — “CO2” (Cloned-O2)? https://www.audioreviews.org/tripowin-x-hbb-olina-review/ Music For The Masses Fri, 15 Jul 2022 08:12:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: John https://www.audioreviews.org/tripowin-x-hbb-olina-review/#comment-1435 Fri, 15 Jul 2022 08:12:26 +0000 https://www.audioreviews.org/?p=53098#comment-1435 Completely agree with this review but it’s a driver in a housing with bass venting and nozzle filter. Once you tweak those to preference, it’s as good as the O2 (or better if you want to tweak to preference.) Obviously, that’s not what should be reviewed and what you described is exactly what folks are pulling out of the carton, nor should anyone need to tweak a new product for acceptability but it’s an easy fix for those that want to make the effort though I’ve found that tweakers get it wrong as much as right. Shouty with poor bass definition out of the box covers it but I guarantee you the pair I have now have slightly more rhythmic bass and a hair less grainy highs (for me) than the O2 I had, to where it would strictly be about personal preference and interface as the 2 would basically be technical equivalent.

I really think these collaborators are way to focused on frequency response, to the point where they completely sacrifice other more important aspects to achieve their result.

]]> By: Jürgen Kraus (Calgary, Canada) https://www.audioreviews.org/tripowin-x-hbb-olina-review/#comment-1401 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:30:36 +0000 https://www.audioreviews.org/?p=53098#comment-1401 In reply to Simon.

Done!

]]> By: Simon https://www.audioreviews.org/tripowin-x-hbb-olina-review/#comment-1400 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:22:09 +0000 https://www.audioreviews.org/?p=53098#comment-1400 The way you formatted the EQ part makes it difficult to read. Each filter in a new row would be better.

]]>